Teacher Salaries Sticking Point in D181 Negotiations

The teachers' union president says a "vocal minority" is standing in the way of a deal, while the board president says he wants a "market-based" compensation package.

The lid came off what had been quiet negotiations between the District 181 Board of Education and the Hinsdale-Clarendon Hills Teachers’ Association (HCHTA) Monday night.

District teachers donning blue t-shirts filled the gym at in Burr Ridge during a regular business meeting of the board two days before the current contract between the district and teachers is set to expire. They cheered in support of HCHTA President Justin Horne when he read from a prepared statement during public comment and stood with hands raised when Horne asked if they supported the union’s offer.

The district and union had previously been mum on points of contention between the two parties during what has been, according to Board President Michael Nelson, more than 40 hours of negotiation over 12 sessions. But the two sides acknowledged Monday they have not seen eye to eye on teacher salaries going forward.

Both the board and the HCHTA want no base salary increase for teachers in the first year of a new contract. The union, however, wants to keep in place step increases, which are raises teachers get based on their longevity in the district. The board’s proposed salary freeze would not give step increases in the first year. Nelson said the average step increase is 2.8 percent.

Offers from the two sides continue to diverge in year two of a potential contract. The union wants a 1.75 percent base salary increase, plus step increases; the board offered step increases in the second year but still no base salary increase.

In year three of a potential contract, the board has offered a base salary increase equal to 50 percent of the CPI increase in year three (not to exceed 2.25 percent), plus step increases. The union handout listed no proposed offer for a third year.

Horne said the district's fund balances would increase with the union's proposed plan. Nelson said that statement is premature because the district is not sure of what revenue it will get from the state and federal governments in future years.

The current contract between the district and teachers expires Wednesday. District 181 director of communications Rita DuChateau said the district plans to start the school year Thursday, as planned, with or without a new contract.

“It would not be the first time a contract was not settled by the first day of school,” DuChateau said.

Horne said the union is “extremely concerned and disappointed” that a deal has not been reached. He said the teachers' union and past school boards have been able to successfully work through collective bargaining disagreements privately. According to Horne, a “vocal minority” seems to have it in for the teachers and is the reason for the stalemate.

"We have never encountered a board that seems so entrenched in a position that would have a negative impact on our teachers, even when fund balances are increasing,” Horne said. “It apparently isn't even about money." 

Nelson said after Monday’s meeting that the board is disappointed with the current impasse, as well.

“We truly value the teachers and the work they do with our students,” Nelson said. “We have an absolutely wonderful district and teachers are really the drivers of a solid education for our kids.”

He said the board supports a “market-based" compensation package that pays District 181 teachers competitively while also taking into consideration the troubled economy, which Nelson said likely isn't going to improve in the near future.

“We, in good conscience, can't keep jacking up taxes to increase pay in the district,” Nelson said.

Three of the four community members who spoke during public comment Monday echoed that sentiment and criticized the teachers for demanding raises.

Nelson was asked whether an agreement will come by Thursday.

“Ideally, yes,” he said. “But ultimately we’re going to get to the right agreement.” 

Joe O'Donnell September 07, 2011 at 03:11 PM
That's correct, clarhillsmom.
Steve Woodward September 07, 2011 at 03:26 PM
And those step increases are not irrelevant. In year 2 the average pay increase is projected to be 2.8%, despite a base freeze. Repeat, average. In year 3 the average pay increases are projected in a range between 2.8% and 5.05%. Of course, the union is asking for a two-year deal, which is another sticking point.
Ann Mueller September 08, 2011 at 03:48 AM
A two year contract is like being elected to Congress (the election is over and you start running again!) No sooner is the ink dry on the contract when "language" in the next contract should start to be discussed. A three year contract is necessary to actually accomplish something in between contract negotiations!
clarhillsmom September 21, 2011 at 12:18 PM
So has the board formally announced their offer?
Joe O'Donnell September 21, 2011 at 02:34 PM
Yes, clarhillsmom, the board has announced their offer. It is detailed in the fourth, fifth, and sixth paragraphs in the story above. The board has not said anything about the offer changing since this story was written.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »