patching...
Update: 1 Facebook likes away from 900! Have you liked us yet? »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Police Merger Would Eliminate 5 Positions, Save Villages Up to $800K, Officials Say

Details of the potential police-department consolidation by the villages of Hinsdale and Clarendon Hills were released Thursday night at a community information meeting in Hinsdale.

 

About one year after the public was first told the villages of Hinsdale and Clarendon Hills were exploring a police-department merger, officials from the two towns gave details on what a combined department would look like.

A Hinsdale-Clarendon Hills police department consolidation would save the villages a combined $700,000 to $800,00 by reducing the number of sworn officers in the two towns from 39 to 34, according to a presentation made by village officials last Thursday.

Only administrative positions would be eliminated, village officials said, so the 39-to-34 reduction is not expected to impact service levels in the two towns.

“In my mind it’s a no-brainer,” Hinsdale Village President Tom Cauley said at the community information meeting in Hinsdale Central’s auditorium.

Between the two departments, one chief position, one deputy chief position, and three sergeant positions could be eliminated under a consolidated model. Village officials have said there will be no layoffs, and the desired staffing levels would be reached via attrition only.

Cauley said several senior-level administrative officers are approaching retirement.

“When those senior people retire, they will not replaced,” he said.

Village officials believe the reduction to 34 officers could be achieved by May 2014. No details on who would lead the consolidated department were included in the presentation.

Currently, the Hinsdale Police Department has between three and five officers on patrol at any given time; the Clarendon Hills Police Department has two to three. Because no patrol officer positions will be cut as a result of the consolidation, Hinsdale Police Chief Brad Bloom said there will still be at least five officers, and as many as seven, patrolling Hinsdale and Clarendon Hills at any time.

Under a consolidated model, patrol officers would likely take on the Hinsdale practice of 12-hour shifts from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., and 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. Between 4 p.m. and 2 a.m. Tuesday through Saturday, there would also one officer working a “power shift.”

While the village must wait on officers to retire, it is also going to take time for the two departments to create one set of policies and procedures dictating how the consolidated department would collect evidence, write arrest reports, and train new officers, among other things.

Bloom said because of that time-consuming process, it is a good idea to start the consolidation process now before the $700,000 to $800,000 becomes a vital need.

“If all of a sudden we’re facing a huge budgetary shortfall, we’re not going to have the adequate time necessary to standardize practices,” Bloom said.

Clarendon Hills Police Chief Ted Jenkins agreed.

“If this is an inevitable process, now’s the time to do it,” he said.

The village presidents (Cauley and Tom Karaba), village managers (Dave Cook and Randy Recklaus), and police chiefs (Bloom and Jenkins) of both Hinsdale and Clarendon Hills were all present and spoke at Thursday's meeting.

The villages are still working to get legislation through Springfield that would allow for the unprecedented consolidation. Hinsdale and Clarendon Hills also have to set up an intergovernmental agreement to set up governance and financial obligations, and set up a new board of police commissioners and a new police pension board.

For more on this topic, check back with Patch in the coming weeks and check out the villages' police consolidation webpage.

Read more about the potential Hinsdale-Clarendon Hills police department merger:

Sign up for Patch’s email newsletter and get all the top Hinsdale and Clarendon Hills headlines in your inbox each morning. And then like us on Facebook!

Related Topics: Hinsdale Police, clarendon hills police, and police merger

Patch_comments_icon

Joe O'Donnell

10:56 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

It's impossible to get all of the different angles of this police merger story in one article—there are issues with pensions, governance, and use of existing facilities, to name a few—so look for additional reporting from Patch in the near future. What questions do YOU want answered about the merger? Tell us here!

Reply

Dutch sandy

11:01 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Merge the entire village governments that 800k will look small them look at the pensions why do public sector workers deserve a pension not private don't they work for us?

Reply

Dutch sandy

11:01 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

While you sit in the train headed downtown count the number of towns you pass thru all with their own entire village governments and pension commitments consolidate cut the number of village employees and pensions why stop with the police department

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Joe O'Donnell

11:06 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

It's an interesting point. Tom Cauley said that Illinois has far and away the most government bodies of any state. A ton more than the state with the second-most, which I believe is Pennsylvania. I don't see Hinsdale and Clarendon Hills becoming one town any time soon, but it is an interesting thought.

Reply

Christa Roehl

9:07 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012

Aren't no brainers things that you can impact without state level changes? As an example, why aren't we focused on creting revenues through development of Ogden and Monroe instead ofmletting it rot and have a 10 yr liquidation sale of carpets, development of 55th and County Line Rd, strengthening the downtown area through development and keeping the store fronts full. Maybe some revenues from these sources would help the no brainer of fixing or rapidly crumbling roads. Is going through the hassle of combining two municipalities, or portions of, worth 300-400k savings to each town when you can tackle local issues directly yourself? Certainly we can manage payrolls, pensions and benefits locally before going through the state to change state laws and regs to eliminate 4 jobs.

Reply

Leave a comment